Treason by the Back Door: Why I Believe the Labour Front Bench Has Betrayed the Crown and the British People

It is no exaggeration to say that our democracy stands at a dangerous crossroads. Decisions taken by the current Labour Government have—by my informed and reasoned interpretation—crossed the threshold of constitutional loyalty and entered territory that I believe meets the legal and moral standard for treason under the Treason Act 1351. This isn’t a claim made lightly. But when a government endangers national security, empowers hostile actors, and erodes sovereign authority, citizens have a duty to speak with clarity and conviction. I am doing so now.

🔍 The Catalyst: The Afghan Data Breach and Its Deadly Aftermath

In 2022, a grave data breach by the Ministry of Defence exposed thousands of Afghan nationals who had served alongside British forces—interpreters, intelligence contacts, and their families. These individuals were promised protection in return for their service. Their personal details were leaked, and a super-injunction was put in place to shield them from Taliban discovery.

Fast-forward to summer 2025: The Labour Government revoked that super-injunction. It did so during Parliament’s summer recess—shielded from immediate scrutiny. Since then, Taliban officials have confirmed they’ve had access to the data since 2022. Executions have begun. The Taliban has publicly declared intent to pursue the remaining names. UK-based human rights firms, some arguably more motivated by financial gain than protective justice, are lining up compensation claims.

This revocation, in my view, was not only reckless but a direct betrayal of duty. It assisted the enemies of the Crown. It exposed British-aligned individuals to mortal harm. It emboldened a terrorist regime still actively hostile to our national interests. That, by any constitutional standard, is treasonous.

⚖️ Treason Act 1351: Why This Is Not Just Political

The Treason Act is one of the oldest statutes still in force in English law. Its core principles remain relevant:

• Levying war against the Crown

• Adhering to the King’s enemies and giving them aid and comfort

• Compromising sovereign authority

  
  

We may not be in conventional warfare with Afghanistan—but the Taliban remains a violent, anti-British regime that has actively targeted our military, diplomatic, and intelligence operations. Facilitating their ability to identify and eliminate UK-affiliated individuals is not just a failure of governance—it is, in my interpretation, waging war against the Crown by proxy.

🌍 Wider Pattern of Betrayal: Foreign Policy Failures

The Afghan super-injunction is not an isolated incident. Labour’s foreign policy conduct reveals a broader pattern:

• Ceding sovereignty over the Chagos Islands through treaty concessions that compromise territorial integrity.

• Channelling UK aid and legitimacy to transitional regimes in Syria, some of which include known jihadist figures.

• Operating foreign media networks within presidential offices, a move that may rehabilitate adversarial actors hostile to British interests.

These actions appear to be facilitated by Inter Mediate, an NGO formerly led by Jonathan Powell—now appointed National Security Adviser under Keir Starmer. They’ve occurred with the apparent endorsement of the Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary, and the Labour front bench. I contend this is systemic, not accidental.

🧭 What I’ve Done: Letters, Outreach, and Demands for Accountability

I have formally written to Dame Priti Patel MP outlining my position in detail. I asserted that the actions of Sir Keir Starmer, David Lammy, and the Labour front bench constitute treason under the 1351 Act. I’ve called for:

• Immediate formal proceedings

• A Parliamentary inquiry

• Protective intervention for those affected

• A constitutional review of modern treason definitions

• Public reaffirmation of allegiance to the Crown

  
  

I have also forwarded this correspondence to:

• Rt Hon John Whittingdale MP (my constituency MP)

• Rt Hon Tom Tugendhat MP (Security Minister)

• Rt Hon Jeremy Quin MP (Defence Select Committee Chair)

• Rt Hon Bernard Jenkin MP (Constitutional Affairs)

• Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC), now chaired by Dame Jackie Doyle-Price

  
  

🔊 Let’s See Who Responds—and Who Turns Away

These are serious allegations. The documentation is detailed. The legal framework is centuries old and still binding. What remains to be seen is whether those in positions of authority will respond with urgency and integrity—or remain silent while Britain sleepwalks toward a regime where constitutional duty is overridden by political expediency.

This isn’t just about protecting Afghan allies. It’s about safeguarding our own constitutional soul. To those in power: the time for ambiguity is over.

Choose your allegiance. Serve the Crown and the people—or be judged by history as complicit in its undoing.